央视快评：坚定信心、抖擞精神 齐心协力加油干******
【央视快评】坚定信心、抖擞精神 齐心协力加油干
1月18日，在中华民族传统节日春节即将到来之际，习近平总书记通过视频连线看望慰问基层干部群众，向全国各族人民致以新春的美好祝福，祝各族人民身体健康、阖家幸福、事业进步、兔年吉祥！祝愿伟大祖国繁荣昌盛、国泰民安！
在与各地基层干部群众视频连线过程中，习近平总书记嘘寒问暖、关怀切切，令人动容！人民领袖始终把人民放在心中最高位置，心怀家国、躬身为民，温暖人心、催人奋进。
千头万绪的事，说到底是千家万户的事。每逢春节前夕，习近平总书记总要专门看望慰问干部群众。从集中连片深度贫困地区到乡村振兴广阔新天地，从受灾困难群众的新居所到百姓购置年货的街道、超市，从历史文化古城到少数民族村寨，总书记同基层干部群众拉家常、迎新春、话未来，心系民生冷暖、情牵万家灯火，充分彰显了“我将无我，不负人民”的为民情怀。
从实地调研到视频连线，变化的是形式，不变的是爱民初心。人民领袖的心始终同全国各族人民的心连在一起。此次通过视频连线，习近平总书记了解了黑龙江、福建、新疆、河南、北京、四川多地基层运行情况，与医务人员、老年朋友、企业员工、商户等亲切交流，对疫情防控、养老、春运、乡村振兴等作出重要指示。深切的牵挂、谆谆的嘱托，令广大基层干部群众深受鼓舞，为我们奋进新征程指明了前进方向。
一元复始，万象更新。新的一年，我们要牢记总书记的嘱托，全面贯彻落实党的二十大精神，开好局、起好步。要落实好新阶段疫情防控各项举措，进一步扩充医疗资源，保障好群众的就医用药需求，着力做好重症救治的应对准备，加强农村老幼病残孕等重点人群医疗保障，确保农村地区平稳转段，群众平安过年。要坚持稳中求进工作总基调，突出做好稳增长、稳就业、稳物价工作，确保产业链供应链安全稳定，全力做好煤电油气保供稳价工作，确保经济社会发展用能需求，提升保通保畅能力，确保重点物资运输畅通有序。要全面落实以人民为中心的发展思想，着力保障和改善民生，紧紧抓住人民最关心最直接最现实的利益问题，关注衣食住行等方面的困难，回应养老、医疗等方面的诉求，想人民之所想，行人民之所嘱，把惠及百姓的各项工作做实做细，让发展成果更多更公平惠及全体人民，扎实推进共同富裕。
蓝图绘就号角响，正是大展宏图时。癸卯兔年将至，让我们更加紧密地团结在以习近平同志为核心的党中央周围，坚定信心、抖擞精神，脚踏实地、久久为功，齐心协力加油干，风雨无阻向前行，在新的一年里有更大作为、更大收获。
央视评论员
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 盈彩地图 |
